|
|
此文章由 kanweng 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kanweng 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 kanweng 于 2023-3-19 09:45 编辑
还是去读读wiki 为什么要有AUKUS 协议吧，买核潜艇的目的根部不是防谁， 因为中国在印度洋-太平洋海域、南海地区的影响， 美日澳韩，连在一起围堵中国， 想着中国在围堵第一岛链内。 要明白，中国已经不是假想敌。
弗吉尼亚级是一类核动力巡航导弹快攻潜艇, 攻击潜艇，如果为了防卫， 大可不必花这么多钱买8艘二手潜艇，正常只能有3艘在水下，完全可以澳洲本土制造50艘Collins级别， 反正都是发射常规导弹。
如果中国武统台湾，美国参与， 你别告诉我澳洲不会参与， 二战后还没有一场战争澳洲没有产于过呢， 俄乌战争咱澳洲还送近7个亿呢武器+战车援助，
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUKUS
The US Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy called the pact a "greater and deeper partnership" between the countries and said that it would provide a "lot of deterrence" in the Indo-Pacific.[7] The government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) was vocal in its contempt of the pact, accusing the three western countries of having a "cold-war mentality",[8] as the pact was widely seen as being, at least in part, a response to China's status as an increasingly assertive emerging superpower.[9]
Former Liberal prime minister Tony Abbott called the move "the biggest decision that any Australian government has made in decades" as "it indicates that we are going to stand shoulder to shoulder with the United States and the United Kingdom in meeting the great strategic challenge of our time, which obviously, is China".[103] Abbott said that Australia would be safer as a result, and cited China's increasing naval firepower as a justification for the deal.[103]
The Australian defence minister at the time, Peter Dutton, responded by saying that Australia wanted peace and stability and "an opportunity for Indonesia, Vietnam and Sri Lanka and Korea to continue to develop". Dutton further dismissed "outbursts from China" and said that Australia was a "proud democracy" committed to "enduring peace and this collaboration makes it a safer region ... no amount of propaganda can dismiss the facts".[52] |
|
我爱我家征文 - 搬家记事 (2008-4-9) patrickzhu 
欧洲归来，新鲜出炉之第一手法德瑞三国16天带娃游记和经验（2022年夏天）全部更新完毕 (2022-7-15) xmaseve 
楼主:astina
发表于 2023-3-18 19:54
