|
此文章由 SAland 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 SAland 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 SAland 于 2018-12-11 13:26 编辑
Hetbert 发表于 2018-12-11 10:39 
有四名受害者DNA的血渍91也有很多的疑点:
第一个疑点是:法医在去搜查的路上和那天早晨的通气会上,得到 ...
谢谢分享。
。。。Ms Campbell stated that the information she received from Ms LeCompte on the drive to the premises of 4 Beck Street on 13 May 2010 was that they were going to concentrate the search on this particular day on the garage. She was further informed that, ‘they believed that the occupant of the house had been in the garage and they wanted to see if there was any blood staining in it’. Ms Campbell stated that, ‘a plan was formed that we would concentrate on the garage that day that we would be looking for any sort of blood staining on any of the furniture, on the floor or on any of the tools. Basically, all the contents of the garage was to be searched’. Ms Gerhard confirmed that the biologists were given particular instructions to screen the premises for blood.。。。
其他技术层面的分析我不熟,不评论,但就定向性搜查这一条,辩护律师应该反复盘问警方是基于什么理由来进行定向搜查的。在合理的程序中,任何警察的搜查都必须基于 reasonable cause,从这一条入手盘问,是可以挖出背后的因由的。反过来说,且不论是不是警方有意栽赃 如果没有 reasonable cause,纯粹出于钓鱼而搜查,这个搜查也是违法的。 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|