|
|
此文章由 Hetbert 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Hetbert 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 Hetbert 于 2018-12-10 19:01 编辑
SAland 发表于 2018-12-10 18:18 
多谢分享，我看完视频，想问两个问题：
1. 有哪一位曾经用家里普通的剪子能如此嗖嗖地清脆利落地剪一个 ...
这个是有原因的，检方先故意散布不实信息来钓鱼，对Cathy说谢是嫌疑人，血脚印显示凶手的鞋是9.5号的ASIC，和谢的尺码一样。
（实际上法医给出的是8.5-10.5）
The Crown submitted that no impropriety or illegality had been established by the Accused. Whilst acknowledging that an inaccurate statement had been made to Kathy Lin during the examination concerning the killer’s shoe size (US-men’s size 9.5 instead of US-men’s size 8.5-10.5), the Crown submitted that this did not constitute impropriety.
谢听到消息就剪了自己的几个ASIC 9.5码的鞋盒，泡软以后马桶里冲掉了。
每个鞋盒上的蓝色标签在碎纸机打碎，后来被警方从垃圾桶里拿到，拼了出来。
（是谁都会慌吧？血脚印和我的脚尺码一样，鞋的牌子也一样。谢说自己这么做的原因是心理压力太大，检方认为是做贼心虚。）
https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/54a63da43004de94513dbced
Events on 6 May 2010 and the Cutting Up of Shoe Boxes by the Accused (CCS [75]-[77])
On 6 May 2010, Kathy Lin was questioned about the shoe impressions at the NSW Crime Commission in the presence of her solicitor, Daniel Sheen. Following the hearing, Kathy Lin and the Accused went to Mr Sheen’s office. During the conversation, the solicitor told Kathy Lin, in the presence of the Accused, that her husband was a suspect and that the shoe impressions appeared to have been identified as coming from an ASICS shoe of the same size as that worn by the Accused.
The Crown case is that later that night, the Accused is recorded on video (as part of the surveillance devices installed under warrant) retrieving objects that appear to be shoe boxes, and is later recorded on video cutting up these shoe boxes with scissors and placing the pieced into a shredder, and also into a bucket containing a liquid. The Accused flushed the contents of the bucket down the toilet. The Crown case is that one of the objects disposed of by the Accused was the shoe box that had previously contained the “GEL EVATION II TN333” men’s running shoes owned by him.
A crime scene examination of the Accused’s premises in May 2010 showed that the Accused had a number of pairs of shoes stored in shoe boxes, each of which was individually labelled with a small blue sticker. Also located during that examination was a quantity of shredded paper in the Accused’s garbage bin. A forensic reconstruction of that material revealed shredded pieces of a small blue sticker identical to those located on the shoe boxes. |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
～～亲子聚会主题蛋糕～～ (2009-11-15) 紫雪花 
APPLENET在澳洲10次搬家的经历(填完坑) (2008-4-8) applenet 
楼主:satellite0
发表于 2018-12-10 16:08
