|
|
发表于 2025-8-1 10:33
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 利马克 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 利马克 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
更正，due to typo
What you’re referring to appears to involve a report from the South China Morning Post (SCMP)—not the North or South China Morning Herald—that cited an unnamed Chinese military source claiming the PLA’s tracking attempts of Pelosi’s plane were unsuccessful.
???? Summary of What SCMP Reported:
SCMP quoted a PLA source stating that China deployed J‑16D electronic warfare aircraft and Type 055 destroyers in attempts to track the U.S. Air Force plane (call sign SPAR19) carrying Nancy Pelosi during her August 2, 2022 flight to Taiwan.
According to that source, the PLA’s electronic capabilities were jammed by the U.S. aircraft carrier strike group, and most of the PLA's efforts failed.
Taiwan’s Ministry of Defense also commented on the situation, not outright confirming or denying SCMP’s reporting, but did note that SCMP cited a PLA source indicating U.S. military interference hindered Chinese tracking.
✅ Therefore:
It was the South China Morning Post, not “South China Morning Herald,” that made this claim.
The SCMP article attributed the claim to an unnamed PLA source, not directly citing RFI (Radio France Internationale).
SCMP stated that PLA tracking efforts failed due to U.S. electronic countermeasures—not that they "lost track" in the sense of being unaware of the plane’s position, but that their attempts were largely ineffective.
---
???? Final Takeaway:
SCMP reported based on a PLA source that China’s electronic warfare assets were unable to locate Pelosi’s plane effectively, due to jamming by U.S. systems.
There is no evidence that SCMP cited RFI in making that claim.
The narrative was that PLA efforts to track the plane largely failed, not that they simply lost track because of confusion or oversight.
Let me know if you’d like more detail or original quotes from the SCMP coverage!
|
|
＜失乐园＞ (2013-1-5) 靠谱的不多 
楼主:dootbear
发表于 2025-8-1 11:36