|
|
此文章由 pinkswan 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 pinkswan 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
司机 你提的这个问题 确实很值得思考 - 也挺绕的
"
If a country's ambassador publicly supports a terrorist organization that is legal in their own country, the host country may still respond strongly. According to international diplomatic practices and the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, several key points apply:
National Sovereignty and Security: The host country has the right to maintain its own security and order. If the organization is designated as a terrorist group in the host country, public support for it may be seen as a threat to national security or interference in domestic affairs. In such a case, the host country may express its disapproval through diplomatic channels, and in extreme cases, may even expel the ambassador.
Non-Interference Principle: The role of an ambassador is to foster diplomatic relations between two nations, not to interfere in the host country’s internal matters. If the ambassador's actions or statements are viewed as meddling in domestic affairs, the host country can declare the ambassador a persona non grata (an unwelcome person). This is a formal way to expel a diplomat under international law.
Legality Issues: Even if the organization is legal in the ambassador’s home country, that does not affect how the host country defines and treats the group. If the host country considers the organization a threat to its national security or public order, it has the right to take necessary action, regardless of the legal status of the organization elsewhere.
Therefore, the host country would have legitimate grounds to expel the ambassador, especially if the public support is seen as a security risk or harmful to the host country's interests.
" |
|
Connie Talbot 小天使的歌声 (2008-5-30) patrickzhu 
楼主:astina
发表于 2024-10-4 19:05
