|
|
发表于 2019-1-13 19:21
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 有口难言 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 有口难言 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
rabbitpoint 发表于 2019-1-13 19:07
孤女性侵案没有起诉吗？还是并案？
孤女“性侵”证词从来没有单独起诉，也没有单独立案，连对质都不许，这是控方高明之处。
前阵子特朗普委任的美国高院大法官，也因为有位女士向媒体透露他年轻时曾性侵自己，于是开展公开质疑听证会，电视直播。
但本案法官不许对性侵证词作对质。下面是法庭记录：
把前面我在3465#里内容转帖过来：
-----------------------
今天找到最早期让孤女“性侵”证词放入本案的法庭文件，在二审中是这样完美实现：
The defence application seeks a so-called Basha inquiry, so named as a result of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal in R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337. A Basha inquiry is sought with respect to each of Ms AB and Professor Parkinson.
被告谢要求就孤女证词作“巴沙”质询，这是一种庭前就某个证人证词作听证，也就是说谢本有机会就孤女的“性侵”证词作个你来我往的质疑，互相摆证据，证明到底证人有没有撒谎。
The Crown does not oppose the calling of Professor Parkinson to give evidence at a preliminary hearing, subject to clarification of areas of questioning to be undertaken. I have been informed that it is not necessary for the Court to make a ruling with respect to the areas of questioning of Professor Parkinson, that topic being a matter of ongoing discussion between counsel. I will, in due course, make an order in terms of paragraph 2 of the Notice of Motion.
The Crown does oppose the calling of Ms AB at a Basha inquiry.
法官同意允许对Parkinson教授作“巴沙”质询，但是，法官不允许对孤女作“性侵”证词的庭前听证
也就是说脏水往你身上泼没问题，但你说我有证据洗干净，我是清白！
法官说：不许！
The Crown has furnished a revised Crown Case Statement, which indicates that the sexual abuse alleged by Ms AB against the Accused will be relied upon, in particular, as evidence of motive. It will be said that the Accused was motivated by a sexual passion for Ms AB to commit these murders, and that he had acted upon that sexual passion with grooming conduct prior to the murders, and more overt and intrusive sexual abuse after the murders.
然后呢，法官又说孤女这个性侵证词，是为证明谢因为对她的迷恋而犯下5条人命的谋杀，这是动机。
https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/5899004be4b058596cba3c87 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
酱酱相传之万无一失李锦记叉烧酱～一种酱料,两个步骤,三个钟头完成的傻瓜版叉烧 (2011-6-5) 胡须康 
楼主:satellite0
