|
此文章由 greenteacake825 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 greenteacake825 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 greenteacake825 于 2016-5-3 17:32 编辑
xhchris 发表于 2016-5-3 16:56 
稍微给你普及一下
negligent driving occasioning grievous bodily harm最高可判处6个月有期徒刑
首先我要感谢你的贡献,要不是这样我也没办法这么快的可以quote出一般 negligent driving 处罚 (这都是来之你提供的链接):
1.
Culpable driving: 1951 to 1994
Prior to the introduction of the offence of culpable driving in 1951, motorists in New South Wales whose negligent or reckless driving caused death or serious injury were charged with manslaughter, inflicting bodily harm by wanton driving or similar charges. It appears that, because of the felonious nature of the charges, juries were notoriously reluctant to convict offenders [3].
In 1951 Parliament enacted an amendment to the Crimes Act 1900, s 52A, creating the offence of culpable driving. The maximum sentence for the offence causing death was imprisonment for five years, for grievous bodily harm three years. The resulting difference in maximum penalties between manslaughter (which attracted a sentence of penal servitude for life but was later reduced to a term of 25 years) and culpable driving causing death, was therefore set at 20 years. This difference the Court of Criminal Appeal later called `too great a gap' leaving a sentencing judge with `insufficient scope for what may be thought to be an appropriate penalty for the offence' [4]. The penalties remained unchanged until 23 December 1994.
In all cases of culpable driving, and for all cases of dangerous driving under the new regime, licence disqualification is mandatory and additional to the penalty [5].
2.
The data for culpable driving gathered since Hallacoglu now provide a much firmer basis in which to consider his Honour's observation. Indeed, JIRS now contains over 480 cases of culpable driving causing death, and Table 1 sets out data relating to those offences where death has been occasioned.
These data show that imprisonment, periodic detention and community service orders (CSOs) were the most frequent outcomes. The use of imprisonment was heavily preferred (47%) when alcohol or other drugs were involved (DUI), while sentencers made greater use of bonds and compound penalties in cases of Driving in a speed/manner dangerous.
Prison terms
In accordance with the data presented in Table l, Figure 1 sets out the minimum and fixed terms of imprisonment, and Figure 2 sets out the full terms of imprisonment imposed for both DUI and Driving in a speed/manner dangerous cases.
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册
x
|