新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 酥皮系列——又是超简单,迷你蝴蝶酥 (2009-6-25) edith921 · 现代新Sante Fe七座SUV长线测评 (2013-4-16) ruanhui2k
· 用旅游的心情生活在这座城(有好看的片片哦) (2005-1-29) bandf · 美食接龙 -- Chicken with ham and cheese, 美讶接招! (2007-12-16) datou2z
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 5626|回复: 11

[个人所得税] CGT on Plant & equipment (Division 40) Depreciation [复制链接]

发表于 2016-8-25 12:09 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 jshubo 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jshubo 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Let's say A bought an apartment for 500k and sell it within 12 months for 600k, he claimed 2 type of depreciation below:

Capital works deductions (Division 43)=20k
Plant & equipment (Division 40) Depreciation=10k

So A's capital gain is

(1)600k-500k+20k+10k
(2)600k-500k+20k

Which one is correct? some people said need to add the 10k, while other said don't, it's quite confusing, if any expert can advise, it's greatly appreciated.
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2016-8-25 13:08 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 jgo 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jgo 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
tongwen

发表于 2016-8-25 22:13 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 大地飞歌 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 大地飞歌 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
no need to add back div 40, as they are furniture related items.

发表于 2016-8-26 12:10 来自手机 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 nicolelyf 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 nicolelyf 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
只加回capital works就可以

发表于 2016-8-27 16:23 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Calvin_Mai 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Calvin_Mai 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
just need to add back Div 43

发表于 2016-8-31 09:30 来自手机 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 erwin 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 erwin 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
需要加回去的,因为你卖房子的价格也包括了那些设备的
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2016-8-31 10:09 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 LENNY_DONG 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 LENNY_DONG 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
取决于你的设备是买房子包含的价格还是你买房子后另外加的设备的

如果包含在买房子里的,需要加回去

不包含买房子得,剩余价值要结算到成本里
CPA&REG TAX AGENT

发表于 2016-9-2 16:44 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 jeff_lawsons 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jeff_lawsons 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
When the property is sold, you would be selling the property itself plus all the depreciating assets within the property. These are two separate taxing events.

The sale of the land and buildings will be dealt with under the CGT provisions (eg, CGT event A1) while the sale of the depreciating assets will be dealt with under the balancing adjustment rules in Division 40. Therefore, it will be necessary to undertake separate tax calculations for each of the relevant assets.

The starting point would be to apportion the sale proceeds between the property itself (ie, the land and buildings) and the depreciating assets. This should be done on a reasonable basis and should reflect the relative market values of the assets being sold. In practice it is common for the proceeds to be allocated to the depreciating assets based on their written down value, but this needs to be reasonable in the circumstances. If this is done then there should be no taxable gain or loss in relation to the depreciating assets.

When it comes to calculating the gain or loss on sale of the property itself, you would need to compare the portion of the total proceeds that relates to the property (ie, land and buildings) with the cost base of the property. The cost base would generally need to be reduced by any capital works deductions claimed in relation to the property. If the home first used to produce income rule in section 118-192 has applied to reset the cost base of the property, the market value that is used in this case should only reflect the land and buildings (ie, it should not include the value of any depreciating assets).

If the property was acquired before 13 May 1997 but post-CGT it would not be necessary to reduce the cost base for capital works deductions that have been claimed under Division 43 ITAA 1997 before that time, refer s110-45. For property acquired during the period from 20 September 1985 to 13 May 1997, you only need to exclude capital works deductions that you claimed, or were entitled to claim, from the cost base if they are for a building, other structure or improvements constructed on the property after 30 June 1999.

If you acquired the rental property before 13 May 1997 and the capital works were carried out before 30 June 1999, the cost base does not need to be reduced by the amount of the capital works deductions (special building write-off) that you claimed.

发表于 2016-9-3 23:02 来自手机 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Southbridge 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Southbridge 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
写个entry 就明白了

Cr profit on sales

Dr accumulation depreciation Div 40
Cr Cost Div 40

Dr accumulation depreciation Div 43
Cr Cost Div 43

Dr Bank

所有Dr减除了profit外的Cr

Bank (600k) -(cost Div 40+ Div 43) (500k) +Accumulation Depreciation Div 43+Div 40 (20k+10k)

发表于 2016-9-7 20:09 来自手机 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 liushui0729 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 liushui0729 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
jeff_lawsons 发表于 2016-9-2 16:44
When the property is sold, you would be selling the property itself plus all the depreciating assets ...

太像我认识的Jeff 了

发表于 2016-9-12 20:49 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 lee2267 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 lee2267 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
你们都被楼主骗了。。楼主的案例根本不成立。。

墨尔本标志性建筑 Eureca 的 Div43 都没有 20K。想啥呢。

Div 40 第一年就 10k 还 with 12 month。。那得多奢侈的 家具哦 。。吓死宝宝了。。。
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2016-10-26 16:49 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 aliciabb 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 aliciabb 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
still very confuse....

Any qualified accountant can answer?

Div 40 要加回去还是不需要??

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部