|
|
此文章由 s970022 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 s970022 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
这两个车相撞的危险性没有可比性。
关于承载车身和非承载车身的车辆碰撞风险，搜索了一篇文章，供大家参考。
https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc ... i/S0001457514001067
Crash fatality risk and unibody versus body-on-frame structure in SUVs
Abstract
Background
In crashes between cars and SUVs, car occupants are more likely to be killed than if they crashed with another car. An increasing proportion of SUVs are built with unibody, rather than truck-like body-on-frame construction. Unibody SUVs are generally lighter, less stiff, and less likely to roll over than body-on-frame SUVs, but whether unibody structure affects risk of death in crashes is unknown.
Objective
To determine whether unibody SUVs differ from body-on-frame SUVs in the danger they pose to occupants of other vehicles and in the self-protection they offer to their own occupants.
Methods
Case–control study of crashes between one compact SUV and one other passenger vehicle in the US during 1995–2008, in which the SUV was model year 1996–2006. Cases were all decedents in fatal crashes, one control was selected from each non-fatal crash.
Findings
Occupants of passenger vehicles that crashed with compact unibody SUVs were at 18% lower risk of death compared to those that crashed with compact body-on-frame SUVs (adjusted odds ratio 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.73–0.94)). Occupants of compact unibody SUVs were also at lower risk of death compared to occupants of body-on-frame SUVs (0.86 (0.72–1.02)).
Conclusions
In two-vehicle collisions involving compact SUVs, unibody structure was associated with lower risk of death both in occupants of other vehicles in the crash, and in SUVs’ own occupants. |
|
金融危机征文 – 裁员风暴 －我和我朋友的故事 (2008-10-31) fycool 
楼主:che999
发表于 2020-5-30 07:24
