|
此文章由 dadahl 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 dadahl 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 dadahl 于 2014-6-17 11:11 编辑
还要升级carlingford的火车站,是不是因为政府的更替彻底没有希望了?
原来说的是2011年开始,2018年通车的
有没有懂内幕的知道
Northern Beaches Rail Line vs Parramatta to Epping Rail Link
Also contained in the report is the assumption that transport planners were operating under for the Growth option that the next line to be built after the Second Harbour Crossing would be to the Northern Beaches. This is mentioned not just in the May 2012 report, but is also included on the maps in the report. The maps are dated 4 May 2010 and show the PERL (Parramatta to Epping Rail Link) as being built at some point after 2036, then operating as an independent shuttle.
This means that just 3 months prior to the 11 August 2010 announcement that Federal Labor would fund the PERL, the then NSW Labor government had placed it so low on its list of transport projects it planned to build that it was not only below the NWRL and second Harbour crossing, but also behind a line that has not been seriously talked about since the 1970s.
This should emphasise the importance of putting good planning first, ahead of political considerations, when it comes to creating a good transport network. Unfortunately it appears the Labor Party tends to put its ideals in the right place in supporting public transport (importantly without the rabid anti-roads ideology of The Greens), but then implements it ineffectively by doing so through the prism of politics. As seen with the proposed funding of WestConnex, it’s not a one off occurrence.
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册
x
|