|
|
发表于 2017-8-6 00:08
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 garysu 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 garysu 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 garysu 于 2017-8-6 00:18 编辑
那些按下去比较觉得硬的板子，在碰撞时是几乎没有什么作用的，完全依靠框架结构来受力
可惜很多人不肯相信
这样的例子很多，老美第一次测试suv车顶安全的时候，得奖的是森林人和tucson，就是大家说皮薄的车，老美一定是丧心病狂了，居然评出来两个日韩车
后来有了小偏置正面碰撞，结果又是一堆日韩车在前面，硬邦邦的美国车反而在后面，又有很多人不信，说是假的。最好笑的是，后来美国机构证明了有的厂家增强了车子一侧的结构来对付这一试验，而没有加强另一侧，其中一个例子就是日本车rav4，于是很多人又说日本人造假，可是那个新闻下面写着无论哪一侧，当时的tiguan撞出来结果还不如当时的rav4，因为两侧都没加强。
还有人非说碰撞试验不科学，重的车吃亏，先不说碰撞试验本身已经屏蔽了同一级别不同车子重量区别的影响，就说一条：现在明明是很多欧洲车更轻了。不过坚持这么看有个好处，因为现在欧美碰撞测试里日韩车成绩排很前面，只有不信评测才有可能觉得日韩车不安全。
到了主动安全的时代更明显了，日韩车好多配上了主动安全手段，甚至有全系标配的，例如马自达的主打车型。这时候你只能坚信主动安全不可靠才能够坚持日韩车不安全了。
看了下面这个很多人更加会觉得就不可能是真的，怎么可能euroncap评出来两个日韩车子做冠军，一定是骗子：
https://www.euroncap.com/en/rati ... in-class-cars/2016/
euroncap评测出三个级别各自最安全的车：
Toyota Prius
Hyundai Ioniq
VW Tiguan
Each year, Euro NCAP publishes a list of those cars that have performed best in their respective categories. Star ratings cannot be compared directly between different categories of vehicles, so a ‘Best in Class’ is published showing which vehicles have performed better than their competitors. As the requirements for each star rating become tougher each year, the ‘Best in Class’ comparison is made only within each calendar year so that all vehicles are assessed against the same standards.
To define the Best in Class, a calculation is made of the weighted sum of the scores in each of the four areas of assessment: Adult Occupant, Child Occupant, Pedestrian and Safety Assist. This sum is used as the basis for comparison of the vehicles. Cars qualify for ‘Best in Class’ based only on their rating with standard safety equipment. Additional ratings based on optional equipment are excluded.
On this page you will find top performer in each category, as measured by the weighted sum of scores. Some categories may not be represented as Euro NCAP has tested too few cars of that class in that year.
READ MORE
Share
|
|
肉松海苔苏打小饼干 (2009-5-9) 习习 
楼主:terena
