红军老板说carroll转会费和小托的直接挂钩

夢回唐朝

Liverpool owner John W Henry has claimed the club did not care what they had to pay for striker Andy Carroll, as long as they emerged with £15million in cash left over after the sale of Fernando Torres to Chelsea.

Liverpool have come in for criticism after lavishing £35million on Newcastle to bring the unproven Carroll to Anfield but Henry said the size of the fee was not a concern as it was always factored in to negotiations with Chelsea.

"The fee for Torres was dependent on what Newcastle asked for Carroll," Henry told The Guardian. "The negotiation for us was simply the difference in prices paid by Chelsea and to Newcastle. Those prices could have been £35million [from Chelsea for Torres] and £20million [to Newcastle for Carroll], 40 and 25 or 50 and 35. It was ultimately up to Newcastle how much this was all going to cost. They [Newcastle] made a hell of a deal. We felt the same way."

With Ryan Babel moving to Hoffenheim for £6million, the difference on the Carroll deal allowed Liverpool to pay for the £22.8million arrival of Luiz Suarez from Ajax.

However, Henry expressed surprise Chelsea were willing to go as high as £50million, questioning whether Roman Abramovich's club could meet UEFA's new financial fair-play rules.

"I was surprised Monday morning to receive an offer [from Chelsea for Fernando Torres] in that amount [£50million] at the same time they were announcing such large losses [£71million for 2009-10]," Henry said.

"The big question is just how effective the financial fair-play rules are going to be. Perhaps some clubs support the concept in order to limit the spending of other clubs, while implementing activities specifically designed to evade the rules they publicly support. We can only hope that UEFA has the ability and determination to enforce what they have proposed."

For Liverpool's part, Henry pledged to live well within the rules.

"We've always spent money we've generated rather than deficit-spending and that will be the case in Liverpool," he said, talking about the way in which his Fenway Sports Group operate the Boston Red Sox baseball team.

"It's up to us to generate enough revenue to be successful over the long term. We have not and will not deviate from that."

tld128

对红军来说3千5百万买个伤兵回来，而且是只威风了半个赛季的年轻小将，这笔帐要慢慢验证啊

夢回唐朝

关键是他说不管小托卖几文，卡罗尔就是15m的差价, 等于是在贱卖小托

tld128

原帖由 夢回唐朝 于 2011-2-5 09:17 发表
关键是他说不管小托卖几文，卡罗尔就是15m的差价, 等于是在贱卖小托

他是变相在说切尔西才是冤大头。。。。。

也不对啊，红军曾拒绝过蓝军的报价啊，蓝军开价低，红军可以压低卡罗儿的报价啊。。。。

carpediem

原帖由 tld128 于 2011-2-5 09:24 发表


他是变相在说切尔西才是冤大头。。。。。

也不对啊，红军曾拒绝过蓝军的报价啊，蓝军开价低，红军可以压低卡罗儿的报价啊。。。。

那就是红军喜鹊联手宰切尔西这个冤大头

widelink

以后几轮将会证明，冤大头就是被出卖的喜鹊。 灾荒年代，金条不能当饭吃啊

holyplague

对滴， 下面几轮喜鹊没前锋了

PACIFIC

这两人价格都太高了

DEC

阿布又一次当了水鱼。
巅峰时期也就值这个数，他比比利亚强多少？小托今后就是个病秧子，红军宰老毛子暴发户一刀，没人心疼。

DEC

原帖由 PACIFIC 于 2011-2-5 11:20 发表
这两人价格都太高了

卡罗尔高得有理，本土球员，万一他就是下一个舒亚纳呢？

Explorer

红军是个慷慨的合作伙伴
足迹管理层可以考虑一下

gifox

原帖由 夢回唐朝 于 2011-2-5 09:17 发表
关键是他说不管小托卖几文，卡罗尔就是15m的差价, 等于是在贱卖小托

前日在match of the day也有谈这个。
主持人说，如果你说25m卖t9 ，然后10 m买ac那是不是很合理呢？

现在t9其实只值得25m（受伤太多）。云云。

不过我觉得生意的东西，多赚以毛是一毛，没有道理是说这边赚多了，那边就要多花。

gifox

原帖由 DEC 于 2011-2-5 11:28 发表

卡罗尔高得有理，本土球员，万一他就是下一个舒亚纳呢？

万一不是？一些伟大的球员让人放心，比如说舒亚纳和当年的king eric都有个特点。他们都是很自律的球员。训练很努力。

carroll最大的问题是他现在缺乏职业素养，哪怕有天赋。你经常酗酒，在场外制造麻烦也是会被磨掉的。

joaquin

小托的粉丝路过

话说俺夏天的时候就在怀疑他1月会跳去海鲜……唉

川北凉粉

我倒是觉得5000W很值，切尔西的几个前锋年纪都不小了，需要为今后补充血液，TLS完全可以在切尔西至少再打5，6年。其次，像TLS这种已经适应英超进球又不少的前锋，真不多，与其像买舍瓦这种不知道能否适应英超的球员，不如买熟悉的，这样价格必然就上去了。最后，对于阿布来说，过年过节花点钱也没关系，只要成绩上去。

PACIFIC

阿布过的是什么年什么节？