|
此文章由 CATHYWSH 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 CATHYWSH 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
LZ你的case下面这个例子正好解释:
Example: Part of home first used to produce income after 20 August 1996
Louise purchased a home in December 1991 for $200,000. The home was her main residence. On
1 November 2012, she started to use 50% of the home for a consultancy business. At that time the
market value of the house was $320,000.
She decided to sell the property in August 2013 for $350,000. As Louise was still living in the home
and using part for business, she could not get a full exemption under the continuing main residence
status after dwelling ceases to be your main residence rule. The capital gain is 50% of the proceeds
less the cost base.
Percentage of use x (Proceeds – Cost base) = Capital gain
50% x ($350,000 – $320,000) = $15,000
Louise is taken to have acquired the property on 1 November 2012 at a cost of $320,000. Because
she is taken to have acquired it at this time, Louise is taken to have owned it for less than 12 months
and must use the 'other' method to calculate her capital gain.
这个例子说明是按照proportion 去算capital gain的。就是你用于produce income的那部分房产才需要算CGT,自住的不需要。
这里还涉及到一个问题,如果你的房子用于produce income 超过12个月,就可以用discounted method 来计算capital gain,就是(卖价-从开始涉及到CGT 当年的房子的市场价值)/2.但是如果房子用于produce income 不足12个月,只能用其他方法计算。这个例子就是如此。
希望解释的清楚了。 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|