新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 背宝宝回国记 (2005-3-9) 茉莉桔香 · 越夜越魅力! 夜景人像分享 (2011-5-24) kur7
· 个人投机计划乱谈,写在美元破百之际(二楼更新期市、房市、汇市、A股完毕,欢迎拍砖) (2015-4-1) shdanding · 那尘封了的伤痕——生命本是一个不断冒险的过程 (2008-10-13) 仰望星空
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 1034|回复: 3

Demographic Environment of Australia [复制链接]

发表于 2007-3-24 23:34 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 彼岸 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 彼岸 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
One of the major macroenvironment forces marketers should care is the  Demographic. Many peers here are businesswomen or businessmen, shall we outline the characteristics of Australian population? This surely helps us to conduct our business here (unfortunately, I didn't do my home work when I started my business a     couple of years ago.) It also helps householders to buy a house.

I have just found some information as below:

1. Information from Parliarmentary library:

http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/1999-2000/2000rp05.htm

Some issues are addressed as well as the feasible strategies, a little bit old.

2.http://www.population.org.au/population/index.html

3.http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/a ... 1393cd!OpenDocument

A big topic, isn't it? Hope to find something out.
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2007-3-25 08:29 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 红色 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 红色 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
谢谢分析.

从优化人口看, 澳大利亚只适合一千万人口.
"...the current standard of living (as determined by the WWF's Living Planet Report 2002), the optimum population for Australia is 10 million (rather than our present 20.4 million) and at a lower standard of living, it is 21 million."

发表于 2007-3-25 09:36 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 彼岸 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 彼岸 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 红色 于 2007-3-25 09:29 发表
谢谢分析.

从优化人口看, 澳大利亚只适合一千万人口.
"...the current standard of living (as determined by the WWF's Living Planet Report 2002), the optimum population for Australia is 10 mill ...


谢谢参与. 那个环境组织的确给出此结论. 但不知政府为什么鼓励生育,即使今天已经面临水,可耕地,石油资源的短缺?

目前五年内, 还是20-23M 的盘子. 但十年后,可能会变小,如果上述资源的问题依然存在. 还有一个变数是全球经济. 如仍火, COMMODITIES 的需求仍大, 现在澳大利亚火的经济会维持,需要多的人力资源.估计再挖很多年没问题.

发表于 2010-8-5 12:51 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 flyinfree 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 flyinfree 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
..............If AU build the high level Appartments instead of house/unit/flat, then only SYD & MEL can content 20M people.............If China's living building standard are as same as Au's then there are only suitable for less than 100M peole.

The low living standard in <WWF's Living Planet Report 2002> might means topest  level living standard in China.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部