“绝对的竞争目标”：为什么精英中学让私校黯然失色

kaien123456789

行者wujiang 发表于 2018-7-16 20:19
读不懂文字，你应该能看清图片吧？

这个世界哪里有绝对公平的事，侨情啥！ ...

联邦政府给的钱是钱，州政府的钱不是钱？

https://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/f ... ead&tid=1405084

“共有788,891名学生的新州公校2017年学生的人均政府拨款为20,281澳元，而共有418,383名学生的非公校学生的人均政府拨款为10,755 澳元。”

OCV

不如谁家穷，谁不读书就让谁上精英学校，肯定没补习，全都是裸考，很公平！

行者wujiang

kaien123456789 发表于 2018-7-16 20:23
联邦政府给的钱是钱，州政府的钱不是钱？

https://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&ti ...

你应该问你自己，州政府少给点，联邦多给点，都是纳税人的钱，有啥不同？

行者wujiang

kaien123456789 发表于 2018-7-16 20:23
联邦政府给的钱是钱，州政府的钱不是钱？

https://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&ti ...

妞爸

这世界上有公平吗，如果有也只是在口头上。每个人的立场不同，所以每个人认为的公平也是不同的。

清墨水

关于拨款，这是去年的拨款情况

https://oursteps.co/ ... ead&tid=1326327

kaien123456789

行者wujiang 发表于 2018-7-16 20:32
你应该问你自己，州政府少给点，联邦多给点，都是纳税人的钱，有啥不同？ ...

我觉得没什么不同啊，所以我算总账的。倒是你，只算联邦，不算州政府。

rabbitpoint

"我不学，我要玩，你们也都不许学！不然不公平“

nis5

kaien123456789 发表于 2018-7-16 20:38
拜托，自己发帖子之前，至少把内容读一遍好吗，真是让人笑掉大牙。

这个文章里的数字，是包含了父母交的 ...

上不起私校不是个人的错。但是这种态度，说真的，也难怪上不起私校。

linkspeed

While selective schools are facing unprecedented scrutiny, the NSW government has been adding more selective streams to public schools in recent years. This paper has shown that even partially selective schools have detrimental effects on comprehensive public schools, and exacerbate existing inequalities in our education system. In the light of the NSW government’s current review of its gifted education policy, the evidence presented in this paper questions the merit of continuing with the model of selective education that NSW has developed. Under the existing model, gifted students from disadvantaged backgrounds have virtually no chance of securing a place in a fully selective school. An
equitable gifted education policy must focus on supporting comprehensive public schools to provide the opportunities that high achieving students need.


It is time to rethink and potentially scale back the segregation of high achieving, highly advantaged students. We need an education system where parents of gifted children can send them to their local comprehensive public school, confident that their interests and needs will be catered for, together with the interests and needs of all students, regardless of ability. In turn, a diverse mix of students in our comprehensive public schools strengthens these schools. Not only do they retain their high-achieving students, and families committed to quality education, but they are better able to give all students the invaluable education that comes from learning side by side with peers from all backgrounds and of all ability levels. Gaining an understanding and appreciation of this kind of diversity is one of the biggest gifts that schooling can offer our society

雅心

天天发私校失色的文章，也改变不了私校长长的等候名单，有些甚至列明2025年前都已满额，报名费都懒得收了。

linkspeed

原文结论

行者wujiang

nis5 发表于 2018-7-16 20:41
上不起私校不是个人的错。但是这种态度，说真的，也难怪上不起私校。

“上不起私校不是个人的错”？你想说啥，人穷还能怪政府？

“还这种态度”，什么态度？什么态度也比无事生非，看着到处都不公平强！

这不公平、那应该取消。真是吃饱没事做。

这个世界上有啥绝对公平的事？

马.自达

linkspeed 发表于 2018-7-16 19:59
没一个贫困，瞎扯吧？

我就认识一个贫困的

我认识好几个145鱼店肉店打工的孩子都是JR的，也许现在华人店小工的工资远超足迹平均水平了

望着天空

马.自达 发表于 2018-7-16 20:54
我认识好几个145鱼店肉店打工的孩子都是JR的，也许现在华人店小工的工资远超足迹平均水平了  ...

瞎说什么大实话，哈哈哈