新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 【参加活动】我喜欢的一部科幻小说——《三体》 (2015-7-1) 飞雪满楼 · 狂欢。悉尼---28~30楼18+~23+更新 (2010-3-1) 老song
· 我从中东人手里买车的经历,分享一些private sale的经验【NSW】 (2015-7-19) Simonjo · 吃喝玩乐悉尼美食好推介,1楼目录,29楼重头推荐tetsuya更新咯~ (2007-12-19) 化化化化
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 16468|回复: 4

对房市几点想法, 抛砖引玉 [复制链接]

2007 年度奖章获得者 参与宝库编辑功臣 飞天奖章

发表于 2007-3-21 15:40 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 astina 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 astina 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 garysu 于 2007-3-21 16:37 发表


“靠出租来供房”是什么意思?用投资房收租来帮助自己供房?


我想是靠房租来COVER投资房的MORTGAGE的意思吧
于无声处听惊雷
Advertisement
Advertisement

2007 年度奖章获得者 参与宝库编辑功臣 飞天奖章

发表于 2007-3-21 16:54 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 astina 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 astina 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 garysu 于 2007-3-21 17:11 发表



正常情况下铁定是不能cover。



另外利率下调不一定有利买家,房价可能因此而升高,这些都很难预测的。更何况谁也不知道利率过一两年是多少。

我觉得买房子真的很看具体情况,能不能遇到符合自己具 ...


这个观点比较实在
于无声处听惊雷

2007 年度奖章获得者 参与宝库编辑功臣 飞天奖章

发表于 2007-3-24 22:03 |显示全部楼层

Tide turning as property wave prepares to break

此文章由 astina 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 astina 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
IF YOU'RE one of the many Melbourne investors disappointed in the performance of your residential portfolio over the past few years, you can hardly be blamed for wondering when your luck will turn for the better.

According to figures from the Real Estate Institute of Victoria, the local market grew by an average of just 2.9 per cent a year between 2003 and 2006 — not exactly something to shout about.

However, a deeper analysis of the institute's figures reveals a more accurate and positive scenario.

From 1980 to 2000, the Melbourne residential property market rose by an average of 9.4 per cent per annum. To test this over a more useful time frame (10 years, which is usually the maximum length of a property cycle) we looked at several 10-year periods between 1980 and 2006. No matter which time frame, the average annual growth was always 7 to 10 per cent.

Even in the period 1985 to 1995, during which the nation's economy took a battering in the "recession

we had to have", the average growth for Melbourne residential property was still 7 per cent per year.

In the decade from 1996 to 2006, the market's average annual increase was 8.7 per cent. As previously mentioned, the increase was just 2.9 per cent per year for four of those years (2003 to 2006). During the latter period, the average compound increase underperformed the 10-year average by more than half.

If the residential property market is to remain true to its historical performance and retain its 7 to 10 per cent annual increase for the 10 years from 2003 to 2013 — and we don't see any reason why it wouldn't — compound growth over the next six years must beat the 10-year average by 4 to 7 per cent per year. This means total growth of 11 to 17 per cent per annum.

Can the market deliver? We believe it can.

The residential market is a bit like a rubber band — the longer and more firmly you hold the band back, the further and faster it will move forward when you release the restraint.

In historical terms, four years is a relatively long lay-off time for Melbourne's residential market. We are now seeing signs the market has been held down as far as it can go, and is beginning to rebound.

Melbourne's inner suburbs, where auctions predominate, are a good barometer of market trends. Auctions depend on competition, so the higher the clearance rate, the greater the level of competition.

During February, auction clearance rates were more than 80 per cent; substantially higher than the 60 to 65 per cent in the same month last year.

If this trend continues, it is only a matter of time before the increased competition fuels price rises.

Who is driving this activity? We believe it is two distinct groups — baby boomers downsizing from large family homes, and generation Y DINKS (double income/no kids) focusing on establishing careers and sowing the seeds of financial security before they start their families.

The intriguing thing about the increased competition is that, on the demand side, the Melbourne market is still only flying at half-mast. While second and subsequent home buyers such as the boomers and gen Y are very active, investors are yet to come back into the fray on a large scale.

Once these investors begin to move — most likely in the second half of 2007 and into 2008 — the market will return to full strength and the level of competition will move up another gear.

In this scenario, it's quite feasible that our predictions of 11 to 17 per cent average annual growth will come to pass; generating long-anticipated equity for investors and complementing other asset classes in their portfolio.

Mark Armstrong and David Johnston are directors of Property Planning Australia, which advises on property and finance strategies.


http://www.theage.com.au/news/bu ... /1174597889124.html

评分

参与人数 1积分 +8 收起 理由
villa + 8

查看全部评分

于无声处听惊雷

2007 年度奖章获得者 参与宝库编辑功臣 飞天奖章

发表于 2007-7-17 15:53 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 astina 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 astina 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 villa 于 2007-7-17 15:52 发表
“宁信书,不如无书”



好象应该是"尽信书,不如无书?"

2007 年度奖章获得者 参与宝库编辑功臣 飞天奖章

发表于 2007-7-17 16:06 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 astina 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 astina 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
,看来说法真多啊

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部